K. Feldbausch
To Win
H. Matsuoka
To Win
Hayato Matsuoka vs Emilien Demanet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L L L W
Form
W W L L L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Matsuoka 1 - 0 Demanet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matsuoka winning 2 and Demanet winning 0. The last match between Matsuoka and Demanet was at the M25 Angers, 22-04-2025, First, Clay with Hayato Matsuoka getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hayato Matsuoka | 1 |
| Emilien Demanet | 0 |
M25 Angers(22-04-2025)
6
1
6
0
| Matsuoka | Stats | Demanet |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (9-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (7-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 618 | Ranking | 641 |
| 609 | Highest Rank | 577 |
| 20 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 56% (66-51) | Career Total W/L | 52% (43-40) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Emilien Demanet
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:6:37 | Average Match Time | 1:6:37 |
| 71% (27/38) | 1st Serve % | 64% (25/39) |
| 74% (20/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 36% (9/25) |
| 64% (7/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 21% (3/14) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 69% (27/39) | Return Points Win % | 29% (11/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hayato Matsuoka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Emilien Demanet
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Iliyan Radulov
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Charles Chen
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilien Demanet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Emilien Demanet
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Emilien Demanet
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Emilien Demanet
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
3 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Andrea Picchione
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Simeon Stankovic
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
35
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Emilien Demanet
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Emilien Demanet
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Emilien Demanet
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Karl Poling
72%
(
88 of
122)
1st Serve %
68%
(
90 of
133)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
58 of
90)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
50 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (66/51) | Win/Loss | 52% (43/40) |
| 56% (154/121) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (96/91) |
| 53% (1372/1221) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (885/879) |
| 59% (44/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (27/20) |
| 54% (22/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (15/16) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 151 | Aces Total | 114 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 213 | Total Double Faults | 108 |
| 1:29:31 | Average Match Time | 1:49:12 |
| 442.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 457.27 |
| 67% (4144/6227) | 1st Serve % | 68% (3611/5326) |
| 62% (2582/4144) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2213/3611) |
| 49% (1015/2083) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (847/1715) |
| 43% (314/733) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (276/603) |
| 43% (2772/6449) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2346/5450) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 14% (1/6) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (65/45) | Futures W/L | 52% (43/39) |
| 56% (66/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (41/81) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (13/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (12/19) |
| 46% (19/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 82% (72/59) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (45/38) |
| 18% (72/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (45/7) |
| 16% (45/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (38/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
